Tuesday, May 17, 2011

baseball diamond

baseball diamond. Marble Baseball Diamond
  • Marble Baseball Diamond



  • sesnir
    Apr 22, 04:33 PM
    Looks top-heavy and tough to hold. Not going to happen.





    baseball diamond. Baseball Diamond
  • Baseball Diamond



  • aswitcher
    Oct 24, 08:36 AM
    Great -- that was my only holdout. Where did you see the info about 802.11n being included?


    Just an educated guess.





    baseball diamond. Bat, Baseball, Diamond
  • Bat, Baseball, Diamond



  • caspersoong
    Apr 22, 05:23 AM
    Stop suing others when you're in the wrong. So irritating.





    baseball diamond. Baseball Diamond
  • Baseball Diamond



  • wmmk
    Jul 11, 08:56 PM
    Who's "Walk Mossberg"?
    Walt Mossberg, of the WSJ.
    People make typos. Live with it:rolleyes:





    baseball diamond. diamond for youth aseball
  • diamond for youth aseball



  • SchneiderMan
    Jan 28, 02:11 AM
    You wont like the sound of it..

    They don't sound bad but they are of course, overpriced cheap plastics.





    baseball diamond. aseball diamond background.
  • aseball diamond background.



  • iApples
    May 1, 11:51 PM
    Does this mean the US is going to stop pumping their oil? Or was that not part of the deal? ...





    baseball diamond. School Baseball Diamond
  • School Baseball Diamond



  • bluebomberman
    Jul 10, 05:00 PM
    As for being harsh, it seems like every time a thread on subject gets started, someone says Pages is only really suitable for newsletters, and not for "serious" writing. I find that most of the people who say this haven't gotten much past the template selection window. They see all those newsletter and flier templates and assume that this all Pages is good for. They've probably never created a template of their own and so are missing one of Pages' most powerful features.

    Part of the problem is the way they market it. There was such an emphasis on templates and graphic-intensive stuff when it was first demoed in MacWorld 2005 that it's hard to think it can be a good word processor. My first thought was how it looked 100x better than Microsoft Publisher.

    Again, I think this latest rumor shows that Apple will address some of the perceptions (or misperceptions, depending on who you ask) by allowing people to dive into word processing mode and adding better search and research functions. It just might make me a convert.





    baseball diamond. depth diamond kid aseball
  • depth diamond kid aseball



  • iJohnHenry
    Apr 27, 07:24 PM
    Calling someone "creeeeepy" because they do not fit into your preconceived notion of gender is kind of ****ed up no?

    Well, doh, yes.

    Why do you think 'he' is anonymous??





    baseball diamond. on a aseball diamond.
  • on a aseball diamond.



  • Black Belt
    May 5, 02:22 PM
    Apple's new release timeframe has zero to do with phone upgrade eligibility. Thus BS. And I bet AT&T call center people are so tired of Apple owners they probably make shite up just to mess with their minds and they sit around the lunchroom telling the stories. :p





    baseball diamond. aseball+diamond+diagram
  • aseball+diamond+diagram



  • alexf
    Oct 18, 10:32 PM
    Why, my friend, by "the iPod is Apple's cash cow", you imply that there is only one cash cow. But if you want to use the traditional definition (http://www.dict.org/bin/Dict?Form=Dict2&Database=*&Query=cash+cow) of "cash cow", "a project that generates a continuous flow of money," then the Mac would be more of a cash cow than the iPod, because it has always represented a larger proportion of Apple's profits and revenues. Not once has the iPod represented more of Apple's revenues. So the Mac generates a larger continuous flow of money.

    Not sure what set of rules of logic you are using, but either way you are wrong. The Mac is still more important to Apple's bottom line than the iPod. Apple is also innovating more on the Mac than with the iPod.

    By the way, you might want to look up the definition of the word "emotional" as well. I'm using facts, you're making things up.

    Listen, it's quite simple: For over 25 years Apple was a maker of almost exclusively personal computers and software. Five years ago, they introduced the iPod, followed by the music store (and now video, etc.). All of a sudden - within a period of only five years - iPod and music/video related sales account for almost half of their profit, and soon - by many estimates - will account for at least a full half (and possibly more).

    Now, do you think that Apple considers the iPod and the iTunes Music Store a cash cow? Hmmm... :rolleyes:





    baseball diamond. free aseball diamond
  • free aseball diamond



  • OdduWon
    Jul 21, 04:11 PM
    looks like he's love'n the bunny:D





    baseball diamond. Coaching Youth Baseball
  • Coaching Youth Baseball



  • 3goldens
    May 4, 02:04 PM
    No new iphone in July?

    What am I going to do!

    And this information comes from where you say, one of those idiot ATT customer reps?

    Must be true then!

    But who cares really!

    People who can't wait a few more months need to get a grip!

    After all this leaves so much more time for all the rumors and speculation to get really cranked up!





    baseball diamond. aseball diamond that was
  • aseball diamond that was



  • silentnite
    Apr 23, 10:36 AM
    another unhappy marriage, can't we all just play nice.





    baseball diamond. aseball diamond
  • aseball diamond



  • Mord
    Apr 27, 05:09 AM
    Also, just wanted to weigh in on the "big hands" thing - I'm a woman, born a woman, never any question about it, but my hands are as big as most men's, especially considering I'm only 5'4". So are you going to beat me up just in case I'm a man?

    That's a point I was also meaning to make, If you start scrutinising every woman to try to tell their history you're going to make a lot of false-positives. I have a couple of very tall and broad female friends that have suffered from this despite not being trans.

    People really need to stop making other people's gender their own business, stop making assumptions and give people the basic courtesy of respecting their gender.





    baseball diamond. Baseball Diamond Cake
  • Baseball Diamond Cake



  • rusty2192
    Apr 15, 03:36 PM
    Last one of my night time flowers from the other night.

    http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5066/5618098536_dbfcb7472d.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/48874590@N02/5618098536/)
    IMG_3832 (http://www.flickr.com/photos/48874590@N02/5618098536/) by Rusty2192 (http://www.flickr.com/people/48874590@N02/), on Flickr





    baseball diamond. with a aseball diamond as
  • with a aseball diamond as



  • entatlrg
    Feb 28, 08:25 PM
    Two weeks ago the dude was going wide open doing "7 gram rocks" as he admits ... he's bound to be pretty strange acting about now ... especially if he's drug free according to the drug test he did on air.

    Overdose or suicide wouldn't surprise me, he hasn't ruled out doing drugs again, actually sounds like he looks forward to it ...

    Delusional and having a meltdown for sure, very sad.

    Chemicals are bad.





    baseball diamond. Baseball diamond was on the on
  • Baseball diamond was on the on



  • jtara
    Apr 14, 11:14 AM
    Interesting possibility. It would be extremely difficult to emulate a complete iOS device (custom ASICs and all). But Apple could emulate just enough ARM instructions to emulate an app that was compiled by Xcode & LLVM (which would limit the way ARM instructions were generated), and used only legal public iOS APIs (instead of emulating hardware and all the registers), which could be translated in Cocoa APIs to display on a Mac OS X machine.

    There's no need to emulate ARM instructions, though. And they already do emulate all of the complete iOS devices, at least sufficiently to run iOS apps on OSX.

    Apple provides developers with a complete emulation package for testing their iOS apps on OSX. Apps are cross-compiled to x86 code. They also provide the complete set of iOS SDKs, cross-compiled to X86 code.

    An emulator handles the device hardware - touchscreen, display, sound system, GPS (REALLY simple emulation - it's always sunny in Mountain View...), etc. If an iPhone or iPad are attached via USB cable, the emulator can even use the accelerometer and gyroscope in the device. Obviously, this could be easily changed to use some new peripheral device.

    Other than device emulation, the apps suffer no loss of speed, since they are running native x86 code. In fact, they run considerably faster (ignoring, for this discussion, device emulation) than then do on an actual iOS device.

    All Apple would need to give consumers the ability to run iOS apps on their Macs would be to provide them with the emulator (or, more likely, integrate it into the OSX desktop. I think end-users would find the picture of an iPhone or iPad that the emulator draws around the "screen" cute for a couple of days, but then quickly tire of it...), and add an additional target for developers.

    What we've seen certainly seems to suggest that's what this is. HOWEVER:

    1. For a single app to be compatible with both ARM and x86, they would need to introduce a "fat binary" similar to what they did with the transition from PowerPC to x86. This would bloat apps that are compatible with both to double their current download size. Current Universal (iPhone/iPad) apps are NOT fat binaries. They have multiple sets of resources (images, screen layouts, etc.) and the code needs to have multiple behaviors depending on the device. i.e. the code has to check "is this an iPad? If so do this...

    Currently, developers have to create separate binaries for use on the emulator or the actual device.

    2. Several developers have checked-in here to say that their apps are listed this way. None have offered that they had any advance knowledge of this, or did anything to make it happen. If this is about ARM/x86 fat binaries, the developer would have had to build their app that way. And even if it didn't require a re-build, I think it's highly unlikely that Apple would start selling apps on a new platform without letting the developers know!

    3. Apple is *reasonably* fair about giving all developers access to new technology at the same time. They also generally make a public announcement at the same time as making beta SDKs available to developers. (Though the public announcement may be limited in scope and vague.) There are so many developers, that despite confidentiality agreements, most of the details get out to the public pretty quickly, though perhaps in muddled form. While Apple DOES hand-pick developers for early-early access, it's typically not THAT early. A few weeks, max.

    I do think that an x86 target for iOS apps is inevitable. Just not imminent.

    My best guess is that this was a screw-up by the web-site developers. Perhaps they did a mockup of the app store for the marketing people, selected some apps or app categories that seemed likely candidates, and slipped-up and it went live on the real app store.





    baseball diamond. The Baseball diamond.
  • The Baseball diamond.



  • Agurri
    Jul 25, 10:05 AM
    one battery? how does that work?

    Heck I don't know ...





    baseball diamond. that the aseball diamond
  • that the aseball diamond



  • k995
    Apr 29, 12:26 AM
    For people buying an expensive smartphone getting the 3GS is a good deal. Notice how they sell more of them then any other smartphone besides the iPhone 4, even when Android handset makers give away their product.

    No its not, its old hardware and knowing apple after 2 years the iOS support isnt going to last for very long. Seeing its only 100 under the iphone 4 price with less disc space its really only for those people who desperatly want an apple phone but cant spend that extra 100 . But for those people no doubt there are plenty of very good and cheaper alternatives.





    mac.rumors
    May 3, 08:29 AM
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8G4 Safari/6533.18.5)

    Is it confirmed these beauties have SATA III?





    GregAndonian
    Apr 17, 02:44 AM
    If Lion does give you the ability to emulate iOS apps on your Mac....

    How do you control them?

    What about a Magic Trackpad?





    kfury77
    Apr 15, 02:55 AM
    You can 'like' a purchased track from within the music player app now, and post a comment about it. Surprised no one else mentioned this yet... Anyone else spotted any additional changes?
    http://instagr.am/p/DKjvV/





    AtariMac
    Mar 31, 10:58 AM
    That looks awful.





    rxse7en
    Jul 28, 08:08 AM
    Don't discount microsoft - they have money to lose for years in trying to get #1 for MP3 - slowly they creep up and overturn Apple - apple doesn't ahve the same stamina.

    A long term commitment, not a short term thing.

    Aside from trying to be funny, I was just pointing out that--for myself--I'd rather read about Mac rumors not MS rumors. I think the whole point of confirming Zune this early is just this, create spin. A consumer, music product that is years away from making any impact is now first page news on Macrumors...again.

    I understand its potential. I understand MS's deep pockets. I would just prefer to read about it on MSrumors.com or Zunerumors.com. :D

    B



    No comments:

    Post a Comment